The Death Star, on the other hand, has a laser so powerful it can literally destabilize the geological processes of the planet itself, and cause it to explode.Д®dit: Imagine it like this: We as humans have the power to destroy the surface of the Earth today through nuclear bombardment and render it absolutely inhospitable to life, but we have nowhere near enough power to actually destroy the planetary body itself into tiny chunks of rock like the Death Star can.STAR WARS: Executor-class Star Dreadnoughts ('Super Star Destroyers') A Star Destroyer is named as such because it can use this firepower to realistically dominate a single star system by itself. It can realistically destroy a planet, rendering all traces of civilization to oblivion, but it will still leave the planet itself intact, although in a much more ruined state.

A Star Destroyer has some pretty powerful firepower on board, and repeated orbital strikes from its turbolaser batteries can level entire cities from orbit, not to mention the fighter and bomber wings it has on board that can run sorties and bombing runs on smaller targets. Yes, although not in the way the Death Star can. What If Fiction ( This is the best place for 'general' questions)ДЇor non-serious answers for real world science problems try:ДЄnd just for fun, don't forget to check out our friends at Who would win ( Go here for questions about who would win in a fight or competition between two or more characters) This subreddit is for discussion of fiction using information about the universe and not meta information about the work. Spoilers from works older than six months may optionally be concealed using our flair system, however this is CSS-based and will work only in browsers.Our Spoiler policy must be observed for six months following the date of release.Comment spoilers should be formatted on a separate line as >!.Replace 'Canon' with the work or body of fiction in question. If only the body of your post contains spoilers, you may instead make the title ' Spoilers: Canon' and not use the link flair. The title of your post should not contain spoilers for six months from the date of release.'Speed Force' with no further explanation when asked a question about the Flash) do not constitute satisfactory answers. Report anything that discusses metadata or involves personal attacks. Upvote good content downvote incorrect information.(This doesn't, of course, mean there isn't room for further discussion.)

Search for your question, it may have been asked and answered before.Any sort of competition questions belong in whowouldwin.AskScience and AskHistorians exist for that. r/whatiffiction, a sister subreddit, has rules more accommodating to these sort of questions. General questions are discouraged without a firm set of in-universe rules, most of them boil down to 'whatever the writer chooses' in terms of answers.Avoid questions about real-world pseudoscience (i.e. Any fiction is allowed not just science fiction.You already know Bruce Wayne is Batman, you already know Darth Vader is Anakin Skywalker, you already know Sauron is evil.

However, if you choose to roleplay, please remember that you must answer as if you had all the information available to a member of the audience.

We discourage but do not forbid roleplaying.

Answer the questions from a Watsonian perspective only- no Doylist answers.

your posts with the setting you wish to discuss.

Take the fictional rules of the universe to their logical conclusion, ad absurdum. Doylist perspective can be found here, here, and in the dictionary definitions of the two terms.) Or as calls it Watsonian, not a Doylist point of view (Further reading on Watsonian vs. Use in-universe knowledge, rules, and common sense to answer the questions. It's like Ask Science, but all questions and answers are written with answers gleaned from the universe itself.

Star wars eclipse class star destroyer